• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Training for Translators

Classes for translators and interpreters

  • Start here
  • Blog
  • Classes
    • Coaching for freelancers
    • Subscription
  • Books
    • Translate my books
    • Book Shop
  • About/Contact
    • Privacy Policy
  •  
  • Account

Feb 17 2020
Corinne McKay

What’s the best way to have clients pay you?

Here’s a question from a reader: What’s the best way to have clients in my own country or in other countries pay me? I’m in the US, and checks seem slow but electronic payments seem expensive? How can I handle this?

What’s the best way to receive money from clients, especially if you live in the US?

Well…the tricky part here is “especially if you live in the US.” The best way to receive money from clients is to live in a country that has an actual modern banking system (sorry for that snarky dig, US banking system) and has converted to low-fee or no-fee electronic payments. But if you live in a country that hasn’t done that–like let’s say, the US, where, by various estimates, up to 50% of business payments are still made by paper check, and up to 50% of businesses don’t use electronic payments at all–then you have to be strategic about how you receive payments.

Here, I want to give a shoutout to my friend and colleague Eve Lindemuth Bodeux, who has presented and written extensively about international payments, including on this episode of Speaking of Translation, and in this ATA Chronicle article. Eve’s experience with payment methods is much more comprehensive than mine, so I’ll focus here on how I handle payments from various types of clients.

So here’s my short answer to this question: the best way to receive money from clients (especially if you live in the US), is via the method that is the most convenient, the least onerous, and the least expensive for the client, as long as that method is not completely unacceptable or financially nonsensical for you. Here’s what I mean: the vast majority of the time, I offer clients a variety of payment methods and let them choose the one that works best for them. In a very few cases (i.e. a client who wants to pay by bank wire transfer for a minimum charge job, or a client who wants to pay by paper check in a currency other than US dollars) I will outright say no, but that’s pretty rare. Let’s dig in a little further.

Why (on earth) do paper checks persist?

This is purely a rant and not at all constructive, but let’s pause for a moment and ask: why does the US cling so tenaciously to paper checks? When, in many other countries, people don’t even know how to write checks anymore? What’s going on here? I’m not a banker, but I’d theorize that:

  • Checks are free. In the US, we have yet to see widespread use of an electronic payment system that’s free. There are possibilities, but they all have issues. For example there’s Zelle, but if you have multiple sets of accounts at one bank (which I do), you have to (as far as I can tell) link Zelle to either your personal account or your business account, because your Zelle ID is an e-mail address, not your account number.
  • And on and on it goes: PayPal and Venmo transactions to “friends and family” are sometimes free, but not covered by purchase protection.
  • Checks have a few other “advantages” (I put that in quotes, because really, who likes checks? Basically no one…), largely related to the fact that the US has been so slow to adopt electronic payments. People are familiar with them and understand how they work; many people in the US who I talk to are still terrified that if they give someone their bank account details–for example, for an electronic payment–that person can somehow steal all the money out of their account. The death of checks will be a beautiful moment, but it’s not coming soon enough.

Live with fees and hassle, or try to find a better way?

Especially if you live in the US, I think your first payment method question is a conceptual one: am I willing to put up with bank fees and bank hassles, in the name of “the cost of doing business,” or am I not? That may sound kind of weird, but here’s what I mean: I paid $3,154 in banking fees in 2019. Oh, yes. even my accountant almost fell off her chair when I read her the number. However, $2,683 of that was PayPal fees on my online course and book sales, and I don’t really see a way to sell those things without taking credit cards. Some people (thank you!) will e-mail me and offer to pay for their online course registration via TransferWise, but otherwise it’s PayPal and a commission of approximately 3.5% on every transaction. So there’s the “expense” part of the equation.

On the flip side, I have numerous clients who still pay by paper check. It’s a hassle. I have to wait for the check to arrive. Then I have to not toss the check into the recycling bin with all the rest of the mail which is spam. Then I have to deposit the check using my bank’s app on my phone (as an alternative to taking it to the ATM), keep the signed check until it clears, then shred it, etc. etc. So there’s the “hassle” part of the equation.

But here’s the point: I have personally decided to chalk all of this up to “whatever,” or–phrased more professionally–“the cost of doing business.” With each invoice, I give the client at least three ways to pay:

  1. Mail a check
  2. Pay electronically, by bank transfer
  3. Pay electronically by credit card, using PayPal.me

And whatever the client’s preferred option is, that’s what they do, unless there are some really extenuating circumstances. For example if a new client outside the US wants me to do a minimum charge job, I’ll ask ahead of time how they pay, because I don’t want to pay $15 (the flat-rate international wire transfer fee at Chase, where I have my business accounts) to receive something like $75. But otherwise, I just present the client with the options, and they pick.

But couldn’t you ask/tell the client…

Sure. Sure, I could ask/tell the client that I accept only electronic payments, or that wire transfers must be made by TransferWise–in my experience, it’s the cheapest international wire transfer option, and it’s often even free, as if the payment were coming as a US direct deposit–or that if the client wants to pay by credit card, they have to pay the processing fee. All of those things are possible. However, one of my values in my business is to be as painless and low-stress as possible to deal with. I want clients to finish a project with me and think, “That was so much less stressful than we thought!” And part of that is saying, “Here’s how I accept payments. Take your pick.” If the client already has an established wire transfer method set up, I’m not going to force them to create an account with TransferWise to save me $15. In the same way that I might ask someone, “Would you like to talk on the phone, Skype, or Zoom?” and I don’t really question why they prefer Zoom over Skype, I just put my payment options out to the client and let them have at it.

It’s also completely fine (and a lot cheaper than what I’m doing!) to be less permissive with your clients when it comes to payments. I know several translators who are part-time or full-time digital nomads, who absolutely refuse to take paper checks. If a client’s only way to pay is by paper check, they have to find someone else. I know a couple of other translators who will only accept wire transfers through TransferWise. All of those options are completely fine, as long as you’ve deliberately decided that this is what’s best for your business.

“Because it costs money” is not a great decision-making tool

My preferred ways to get paid are–roughly in descending order of preference:

  1. TransferWise (free, fast, easy)
  2. PayPal for small amounts (fee is a percentage so it’s a small amount, fast, easy)
  3. Paper check (free, slow, painful)
  4. Bank wire transfer for large amounts ($15 but at least it’s a flat rate, fast, easy)
  5. PayPal for large amounts (fee is a percentage so it can be a big hit, fast, easy)
  6. Bank wire transfer for small amounts (pay $15 to receive $75?, fast, easy)

Regardless of your preference, I think there are way too many translators objecting to various payment methods not because they’re objectively really expensive, but because they cost money at all. PayPal for large amounts is really expensive; it’s worth avoiding it if you can. But refusing to see any fee at all as the cost of doing business is, in my opinion, short-sighted.

Readers, over to you? Thoughts on what payment methods you’re using these days and what you think of them?

Written by Corinne McKay · Categorized: Money

Feb 09 2020
Corinne McKay

Should you post your translation rates on your website?

A reader asks: Should I post my translation rates on my website? I feel like this could discourage some of the low-balling clients I don’t want to work with, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do. Let’s take a look!

Why might you WANT to post your rates?

Posting your rates has a few advantages:

  • If potential clients look at your posted rates, they have some idea what you charge. Your posted rates might not align exactly with what that client needs, but they might help answer the question, “Is this translator in my budget?”
  • Posted rates can dissuade “tire-kickers”–potential clients who take up a lot of your time preparing a complicated quote, then don’t turn out to be serious about their project
  • Many translators fantasize that posting their rates will free them from negotiation–a process that many freelancers find excruciating. This may or may not be a valid reason to post your rates (more below)

Why might you NOT want to post your rates?

Well, a bunch of reasons:

  • Once you post your rates, it’s hard to charge more than what you’ve posted. A potential client may be thrilled if you charge less than what you’ve posted, but they may (somewhat understandably) feel a bait-and-switch coming if you charge more
  • Posted rates lock you in; either you have to post a rate for every single factor in a project that might cause you to charge more (rush, complicated formatting, PDFs, documents requiring a lot of research, handwritten documents, and so on), or you have to explain to the potential client why you’re not charging the posted rate
  • Posted rates don’t necessarily help clients–especially direct clients who may not know much about translation–answer the all-important question, “How much is it going to cost me to get this thing translated?” Even if you say that you charge per word, many clients still won’t understand what that means; you’ll get questions (as I once did) like, “Do you charge for the little words?”
  • In my experience, most clients will still contact you for a quote. To be honest, I have direct clients who I charge by the word at a per-word price that we agree on for the entire year, and they still e-mail me their files and ask how much it’s going to cost to translate them. So I’m skeptical that listing your per-word rate will result in fewer requests for custom quotes.
  • Posting your rates closes off the best option for raising your rates, which is to try a higher rate with a new client when you’re already busy. If the new client saw the rate on your website, that’s what they’re going to expect.

Situations in which it’s helpful to post your rates

I think it’s almost never helpful to post your rates, for the reasons mentioned above. The only exception is a service for which you always charge the same thing, no questions asked: like X to translate a one-page official document, or X for a full-day conference interpreting assignment. If you never deviate from that price, go ahead and post it. For services like official document translation, posting your rates can streamline the process, so that you have as little unbillable time as possible, which is a good thing.

I feel torn here, because I’m a fan of rate transparency–I will tell pretty much any other translator what I charge, but I’m hesitant to post my rates on my website, mainly because every project–even a one-page birth certificate–is so different that I don’t like being locked in.

Situations in which you shouldn’t post your rates

If you want the flexibility to charge different rates to different clients, or different rates on different projects, don’t post your rates. It locks you in, and it’s unlikely to free you from having to issue custom quotes, at least to new clients.

Readers, over to you: any thoughts on posting or not posting your rates?

Written by Corinne McKay · Categorized: Rates · Tagged: translation rates

Feb 05 2020
Corinne McKay

New podcast: Diversifying your freelance business beyond translation

In this episode of Speaking of Translation, Eve, Corinne, and special guest Madalena Sanchez Zampaulo discuss how and why (or why not!) to diversify your freelance business beyond translation. We discuss:
-Non-translation lines of work that the three of us have pursued throughout our careers
-The pluses and minuses of having multiple business lines
-Copywriting as an additional business line
-Book publishing as an additional business line
-Additional revenue streams that you might want to consider

Links mentioned in this episode:
–Madalena’s T&I website blueprint course
-Eve’s Global Reads Book Club
-Corinne’s online courses and master classes

Click the audio player link to listen online

http://traffic.libsyn.com/speakingoftranslation/SoT_diversification.m4a

Right-click the link below to download the audio file.
Chrome/Firefox: Choose “Save Link As”
Internet Explorer: Choose “Save target as”
Safari: Choose “Download Linked File”
Diversifying your freelance business beyond translation

Written by Corinne McKay · Categorized: Podcasts

Feb 05 2020
Corinne McKay

February master class: Capitalization in German, with Dagmar Jenner

This month’s Training for Translators master class is coming up, and it’s sure to be a good one! Following the success of Dagmar Jenner’s master class on German commas, she’s back to present Capitalization in German, this Friday (February 7) at 12:30 PM New York time (recording provided if you can’t attend live.

The master class will run about 90 minutes; the cost is just $75 and German translators are sure to learn valuable tips from Dagmar, a translator and German orthography expert. Hope to see some of you there!

Written by Corinne McKay · Categorized: Classes for translators

Jan 21 2020
Corinne McKay

January master class coming up: Interpreting for legal depositions, with Judy Jenner

Join Training for Translators this coming Friday, January 24 (recording provided if you can’t attend live) for our January master class: Interpreting for legal depositions, presented by Judy Jenner. Judy is a Federally-certified court interpreter who has interpreted at over 800 (not a typo!) depositions, and this is our first offering exclusively for interpreters!

As some court systems have reduced the rates for judiciary interpreters, many court interpreters actively look for assignments outside the court system. There are plenty of opportunities available, and depositions, which are typically held at law offices, often require interpreters. There are very few trainings focusing on the role of interpreters in depositions, and this master class will provide an overview of the structure of depositions, the parties, the objectives, the terminology, etc. The instructor will also offer tips on finding clients who may need deposition interpreters.

Attendees will receive plenty of real-life advice on how to manage the flow of information, how to deal with difficult situations, and exactly what to expect during the course of the deposition. Specific terminology related to depositions will also be covered. This master class will be held in English and is thus suitable for interpreters of all languages. The presenter is a federally-certified court interpreter who has interpreted at more than 800 depositions. She is not a lawyer, but is married to one! All participants will receive a recording of the master class afterward.

Hope to see some of you there!

Written by Corinne McKay · Categorized: Classes for translators

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 71
  • Page 72
  • Page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 245
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to the Training for Translators mailing list!

Getting Started as a Freelance Interpreter: Available now in print and electronic editions

Learn from our blog:

  • Survey results: The state of freelance translation in 2026
  • Focus on the clients who can afford you
  • Upcoming direct client marketing class
  • Travel: Cycling Quebec’s Tomifobia Nature Trail
  • Travel: Cycling Burlington, Vermont’s Causeway Bike Trail
  • When part of your business falls off a cliff
  • Upcoming free webinar: Honest brand communications through purpose, positioning, and personality
  • Training for Translators Plus is here!

Search the Training for Translators blog

Copyright © 2026 · Training For Translators · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're OK with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. To view this website's privacy policy, click About>Privacy Policy. Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT